Stacking
Last updated October 1, 2026
Stacking happens when a business takes a second, third or fourth merchant cash advance (MCA) or short-term loan while earlier ones are still being paid. Each funder in the stack pulls its own payment, often daily, from the same bank account.
Example: a business with $60,000 in monthly deposits has a first advance that pulls $500 per business day, about $11,000 a month. A second funder adds $400 a day, and a third adds $350. Now about $27,500 a month, nearly half of deposits, goes to advance payments before rent, payroll or suppliers. One slow month can quickly turn into bounced payments.
Funders that knowingly take a later spot are often called second or third position funders, and they price for the added risk. Other stacking happens without the earlier funder's knowledge, which may breach the first contract.
Why it matters for lenders
Stacking is a major driver of MCA defaults. As the stack grows, ACH returns rise, and collections turn into a race between funders. For the first funder, a new advance taken without consent can mean the same receipts are being sold twice.
Most MCA contracts include an anti-stacking clause, and many funders file a UCC-1 financing statement to put others on notice of their claim on the receivables. Regulators have also stepped in. Under a 2025 Texas law (HB 700), a provider of sales-based financing generally may set up automatic debits only if it holds a perfected, first-priority security interest in the business's receivables. Texas regulators said in 2026 that this partly addresses stacking. Some state disclosure laws also require funders to show how much of a new advance goes to pay off an existing one.
How it works in practice
An underwriter at an MCA funder receives a new submission from a broker. During bank statement analysis, she flags recurring debits to three other funders, plus a large deposit last week that looks like a new advance. A UCC search shows two filings against the business's receivables.
She records each existing position on the deal: funder, daily payment, estimated balance and start date. With those numbers, she calculates total daily payments as a share of average deposits. If the share is above the funder's limit, she declines, or offers a smaller amount that pays off one existing advance. When existing positions are kept in free-text notes instead of structured fields, renewals and later reviews miss them. The funder then approves deals its own policy should have stopped.
Related terms
Merchant Cash Advance (MCA)
A merchant cash advance (MCA) gives a business a lump sum of cash today in exchange for a larger amount of its future sales. The funder collects a share of the business's receipts, often through daily or weekly ACH debits, until the agreed amount is delivered. MCAs are generally structured as a purchase of future receivables, not a loan.
Holdback
In a merchant cash advance, the holdback is the share of a business's daily or weekly sales that goes to the funder until the purchased amount has been delivered. It is also called the specified percentage, remittance rate or split. Many funders collect fixed ACH debits estimated from the holdback and adjust them through reconciliation when sales change.
Bank Statement Analysis
Bank statement analysis is the review of a borrower's bank statements to measure true revenue, balances, overdrafts, returned payments and existing debt. Underwriters use it to check what the application says, size the loan or advance, and find obligations that don't show on a credit report, such as daily payments to other funders.
UCC-1 Filing
A public notice, called a financing statement, that a lender files with a state office to record its claim on a borrower's business assets. Filing a UCC-1 is the usual way to perfect a security interest, which sets the lender's priority over later creditors. In most states a UCC-1 lasts five years unless the lender files a continuation.
ACH Return (NSF)
An ACH return is an electronic payment that the borrower's bank sends back unpaid, along with a code that explains why. NSF, or non-sufficient funds (code R01), is the most common reason. Each return reverses a payment the lender thought it had, and Nacha watches how often a lender's debits come back.
Further reading
See how lenders put this into practice
FUNDINGO runs origination, servicing and reporting on one loan record inside Salesforce.